. Student Feedback Form

The Student Feedback Form should gather insights into the learning experience, course content, teaching methods, and overall satisfaction. This form should provide space for both quantitative (rating scale) and qualitative (open-ended) responses.

Sections for the Student Feedback Form:

A. General Information

• Course Title: _____________________________________
• Instructor Name: __________________________________
• Date: ___________________________________________
• Program/Cohort: ___________________________________

B. Course Content & Learning Experience

1. How clear was the course syllabus and its objectives?
   • (1) Very unclear
   • (2) Unclear
   • (3) Neutral
   • (4) Clear
   • (5) Very clear
2. Was the course content relevant to your learning goals?
   • (1) Not relevant at all
   • (2) Somewhat irrelevant
   • (3) Neutral
   • (4) Relevant
   • (5) Very relevant
3. Did the course provide opportunities for hands-on learning?
   • (1) None at all
   • (2) Very few
   • (3) Somewhat
   • (4) Mostly
   • (5) Completely
4. How effective were the course materials (e.g., textbooks, readings, videos)?
   • (1) Not effective at all
   • (2) Ineffective
   • (3) Neutral
   • (4) Effective
   • (5) Very effective
5. Was the course content engaging and interesting?
   • (1) Not engaging at all
   • (2) Slightly engaging
   • (3) Neutral
   • (4) Engaging
   • (5) Very engaging

C. Teaching Methods

1. How clear and understandable were the instructor’s explanations?
   • (1) Very unclear
   • (2) Unclear
   • (3) Neutral
   • (4) Clear
   • (5) Very clear
2. How interactive was the class (e.g., group discussions, Q&A)?
   • (1) Not interactive at all
   • (2) Slightly interactive
   • (3) Neutral
   • (4) Interactive
   • (5) Very interactive
3. Did the instructor encourage student participation and engagement?
   • (1) Never
   • (2) Rarely
   • (3) Sometimes
   • (4) Often
   • (5) Always
4. How well did the instructor respond to your questions or concerns?
   • (1) Very poorly
   • (2) Poorly
   • (3) Neutral
   • (4) Well
   • (5) Very well

D. Learning Environment

1. Was the learning environment (online or in-person) conducive to learning?
   • (1) Not at all
   • (2) Slightly
   • (3) Neutral
   • (4) Conducive
   • (5) Very conducive
2. How satisfied are you with the technology and tools used in the course (e.g., LMS, video conferencing)?
   • (1) Very dissatisfied
   • (2) Dissatisfied
   • (3) Neutral
   • (4) Satisfied
   • (5) Very satisfied

E. Overall Experience

1. Overall, how would you rate this course?
   • (1) Very poor
   • (2) Poor
   • (3) Neutral
   • (4) Good
   • (5) Excellent

F. Open-ended Questions:

1. What aspects of the course did you find most helpful?
2. What aspects of the course do you think need improvement?
3. Do you have any suggestions for future courses or improvements?

---

2. Teacher Feedback Form

The Teacher Feedback Form should allow instructors to assess the effectiveness of the curriculum, course materials, and overall program delivery. The focus should be on evaluating how well the program’s design supports teaching and student learning.

Sections for the Teacher Feedback Form:

A. General Information

• Course Title: _____________________________________
• Instructor Name: __________________________________
• Date: ___________________________________________

B. Course Content & Delivery

1. How effective were the course materials (e.g., syllabus, readings, multimedia)?
   • (1) Not effective at all
   • (2) Ineffective
   • (3) Neutral
   • (4) Effective
   • (5) Very effective
2. Did the course content align with the program objectives?
   • (1) Not at all aligned
   • (2) Somewhat misaligned
   • (3) Neutral
   • (4) Mostly aligned
   • (5) Fully aligned
3. Were there any challenges in delivering the course content?
   • (Yes/No) If yes, please explain:

C. Teaching Methods

1. Were the teaching methods provided sufficient opportunities for student engagement?
   • (1) Not sufficient
   • (2) Somewhat sufficient
   • (3) Neutral
   • (4) Sufficient
   • (5) Very sufficient
2. Was the class size appropriate for effective teaching and student interaction?
   • (1) Too large
   • (2) Slightly large
   • (3) Neutral
   • (4) Ideal size
   • (5) Too small
3. What challenges did you face in engaging students during the course?

D. Student Performance

1. How would you rate overall student performance in this course?
   • (1) Very poor
   • (2) Poor
   • (3) Neutral
   • (4) Good
   • (5) Excellent
2. Were there any common areas where students struggled?

E. Program Support

1. How well did the program provide resources and support for teaching?
   • (1) Very poorly
   • (2) Poorly
   • (3) Neutral
   • (4) Well
   • (5) Very well

F. Open-ended Questions:

1. What aspects of the program did you find most effective in helping students succeed?
2. What areas do you feel could be improved in the program’s design or delivery?

---

3. Administrator Feedback Form

The Administrator Feedback Form should focus on evaluating the program from an operational perspective, including overall performance, student outcomes, and resource allocation. Administrators can also provide insights into how the program aligns with institutional goals.

Sections for the Administrator Feedback Form:

A. General Information

• Program Title: _____________________________________
• Administrator Name: ________________________________
• Date: ___________________________________________

B. Program Effectiveness

1. How effective has the program been in meeting its educational goals?
   • (1) Not effective at all
   • (2) Ineffective
   • (3) Neutral
   • (4) Effective
   • (5) Very effective
2. How would you rate the overall performance of the students enrolled in the program?
   • (1) Very poor
   • (2) Poor
   • (3) Neutral
   • (4) Good
   • (5) Excellent
3. Do you think the program’s current curriculum is relevant to industry needs and student career goals?
   • (1) Not relevant at all
   • (2) Slightly relevant
   • (3) Neutral
   • (4) Relevant
   • (5) Very relevant

C. Resources & Support

1. How well do you think resources (e.g., funding, staffing, technology) have been allocated to support the program?
   • (1) Very poorly
   • (2) Poorly
   • (3) Neutral
   • (4) Well
   • (5) Very well
2. Is the program meeting the institutional goals and objectives for educational quality?
   • (1) Not at all
   • (2) Somewhat
   • (3) Neutral
   • (4) Well
   • (5) Very well

D. Program Challenges

1. What challenges have you encountered in the administration of the program?
2. What support or resources would improve the administration and delivery of the program?

E. Open-ended Questions:

1. What suggestions do you have for improving the program’s effectiveness?
2. What changes would you recommend to better align the program with the institution’s goals?