SayPro Program Evaluation Template: Effectiveness of Educational Program/Intervention

At SayPro, we use a comprehensive and structured approach to evaluate the effectiveness of educational programs and interventions. Below is a template that outlines how to assess the impact on student success, graduation rates, and academic performance, with statistical analysis to support the findings.

---

SayPro Program Evaluation: [Program Name]

Evaluation Area	Details	Data Collection Methods	Analysis Approach
Program Overview	Brief description of the educational program/intervention.	N/A	N/A
Objectives	What are the intended outcomes of the program?	N/A	N/A
Target Population	Who is the program intended to serve?	Student demographics (age, grade, gender, ethnicity, etc.)	N/A
Timeline	Duration of the program and evaluation period.	Program start and end dates, duration of evaluation	N/A
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)	Metrics used to measure success (e.g., graduation rate, test scores, retention)	Collect baseline data before program implementation	Comparison analysis (pre-program vs. post-program data)
Data Collection Methods	How is data gathered?	Surveys, academic records, standardized test scores, focus groups, interviews	Quantitative and qualitative methods
Statistical Methods	Techniques used to analyze data and measure impact.	Descriptive statistics, t-tests, regression analysis, ANOVA	Use appropriate statistical tools to analyze program effectiveness (e.g., changes in graduation rates, test scores)
Comparative Groups	Is there a control or comparison group?	Students who did not participate in the program, or historical data	Compare results with control group or historical trends
Outcomes	Results of the program based on key metrics.	Graduation rates, academic performance (test scores), retention rates	Statistical significance of changes (e.g., p-values, confidence intervals)
Impacts on Student Success	How has the program affected student success?	Track individual student progress (academic growth, engagement, etc.)	Analyze improvements or declines in student success factors
Graduation Rate Impact	Has the program affected graduation rates?	Graduation rate data before and after the program	Compare graduation rates pre- and post-program; statistical tests to determine significance
Academic Performance Impact	How has the program impacted test scores or GPA?	Collect baseline and post-program test scores, GPAs	Statistical comparison of scores (e.g., paired t-tests, regression)
Retention Impact	How has the program influenced student retention rates?	Retention data over the course of the program period	Analyze retention rate changes using statistical tests
Program Strengths	What aspects of the program were most effective?	Qualitative feedback from surveys, focus groups, interviews	Thematic analysis of qualitative data
Program Weaknesses	What areas of the program need improvement?	Feedback from participants, staff, and stakeholders	Thematic analysis of qualitative data
Recommendations	Suggested improvements or adjustments to the program.	N/A	Based on evaluation findings, propose changes
Conclusion	Overall assessment of program effectiveness.	N/A	Synthesize findings from quantitative and qualitative analysis

---

SayPro Statistical Analysis Example:

1. Pre-Program Data Collection:
   • Graduation Rate: 75% (baseline)
   • Test Scores: Average SAT score = 1150
   • Retention Rate: 85% retention from year 1 to year 2
2. Post-Program Data Collection:
   • Graduation Rate: 85% (post-program)
   • Test Scores: Average SAT score = 1200
   • Retention Rate: 90% retention from year 1 to year 2
3. Statistical Analysis:
   • T-Test (for paired data): Compare pre- and post-program test scores.
   • Chi-Square Test: Compare graduation and retention rates before and after the program.
   • Regression Analysis: Determine if there is a statistically significant relationship between program participation and changes in academic performance.
4. Results:
   • Graduation Rate: p-value = 0.02 (significant improvement)
   • Test Scores: t-value = 2.5, p-value = 0.01 (statistically significant increase)
   • Retention Rate: p-value = 0.03 (significant improvement)

---

SayPro Example of Results Table:

Metric	Pre-Program	Post-Program	Statistical Analysis	Conclusion
Graduation Rate	75%	85%	Chi-Square Test: p = 0.02	Significant increase in graduation rate
Test Scores (Average SAT)	1150	1200	T-Test: t = 2.5, p = 0.01	Statistically significant improvement in test scores
Retention Rate	85%	90%	Chi-Square Test: p = 0.03	Significant improvement in retention rate

---

SayPro Recommendations:

1. Continue the Program: Given the positive impact on graduation rates, test scores, and retention, the program should continue with possible expansions.
2. Adjustments: Focus more on [specific demographic or subgroup] to ensure equity in outcomes.
3. Additional Support: Consider providing more targeted support for students with specific needs to further improve outcomes.

---

Conclusion:

Based on the data collected and statistical analysis, [Program Name] has had a positive impact on student success, as evidenced by improved graduation rates, higher test scores, and increased retention rates. The program has proven to be effective in enhancing student outcomes, and further refinements could optimize its impact for all students.