SayPro Templates to Use
Evaluation Matrix Template
Purpose: To assess and compare the relevance, feasibility, and impact of identified M&E best practices in relation to SayPro’s operational context. This tool supports evidence-based decision-making for prioritization and adaptation.
✅ Best Practices Evaluation Matrix Template
Criteria | Definition | Scoring Guide (1 = Low, 5 = High) | Score | Comments/Justification |
---|---|---|---|---|
Relevance to SayPro’s Mission | How well does this practice align with SayPro’s strategic goals and M&E priorities? | 1 – Not aligned to 5 – Strongly aligned | ||
Scalability | Can this practice be effectively scaled across different SayPro programs and regions? | 1 – Difficult to scale to 5 – Easily scalable | ||
Ease of Implementation | How complex is the setup, training, and ongoing use of this practice in SayPro’s environment? | 1 – Very complex to 5 – Very easy | ||
Cost Implications | What is the expected cost (resources, technology, training) of implementation? | 1 – Very high cost to 5 – Very low cost | ||
Evidence of Effectiveness | Is there documented success of this practice in similar NGOs or contexts? | 1 – Weak/no evidence to 5 – Strong evidence | ||
Staff Capacity Requirements | Does SayPro currently have the expertise or need significant upskilling to implement it? | 1 – Major upskilling needed to 5 – Readily capable | ||
Data Quality Improvement Potential | To what extent can this improve the accuracy, validity, and reliability of M&E data? | 1 – Minimal to 5 – Substantial | ||
Adaptability | Can the practice be easily customized to meet SayPro’s operational and cultural context? | 1 – Hard to adapt to 5 – Highly adaptable |
Scoring Summary Table
Best Practice Name | Total Score (Max: 40) | Decision | Recommended Action |
---|---|---|---|
Example: Real-Time Mobile Data Tools | 34 | High Priority | Adopt and pilot organization-wide |
Instructions for Use
- Use this matrix after researching each best practice (using the Best Practices Research Template).
- Assign a score (1–5) for each criterion based on documented evidence and expert judgment.
- Use the total score to rank and prioritize practices.
- Include brief justification in the comments for transparency.
📝 Format Options:
- File Type: Excel (preferred for scoring automation) or Word table format
- Naming Convention:
EvaluationMatrix_[PracticeName]_YYYYMMDD
- Storage Location: SayPro Internal > M&E Improvement > Evaluation Phase
Would you like me to provide a downloadable Excel version or help populate the matrix with initial examples?
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.