Your cart is currently empty!
SayPro Risk Register and Escalation Form

SayPro Risk Register and Escalation Form
1. Risk Register
Risk ID | Risk Description | Category | Likelihood | Impact | Risk Rating (Likelihood x Impact) | Mitigation Strategy | Responsible Party | Status | Next Steps |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R001 | Delay in youth program enrollment due to staffing shortage | Operational | High | High | 16 | Hire additional temporary staff, extend recruitment timeline | HR/Program Management | Active | Immediate recruitment needed, review current applications |
R002 | Insufficient funding for health outreach program | Financial | Medium | High | 12 | Seek additional funding, prioritize essential activities | Finance/Health Team | Monitoring | Explore alternative donors or partnerships |
R003 | Data collection errors due to lack of trained personnel | Operational | High | Medium | 12 | Provide additional training for field staff | MEL Team/Training Team | Active | Schedule a training session by end of the week |
R004 | Health program not reaching target demographic | Programmatic | Medium | High | 12 | Revise outreach strategies, adjust messaging | Outreach Team/Health Team | Pending | Develop new marketing materials, engage local partners |
R005 | Community pushback on program objectives | Political | Low | High | 6 | Engage with community leaders, hold public meetings | Community Relations Team | Monitoring | Continue community engagement efforts |
Legend for Categories and Rating:
- Categories: Operational, Financial, Programmatic, Political, Technical, Legal, Environmental
- Likelihood: Low, Medium, High
- Impact: Low, Medium, High
- Risk Rating: Multiply Likelihood x Impact (e.g., Low = 1, Medium = 2, High = 3)
2. Risk Escalation Process
Escalation Criteria:
- Critical Risks: Risks with a high impact (rating of 9 or more) that are unresolved or need immediate action.
- Medium Risks: Risks that are medium in both likelihood and impact (rating of 6–8) that are being monitored and can be managed through routine actions.
- Low Risks: Risks with low likelihood and low impact (rating below 6), that are generally acceptable but monitored periodically.
Escalation Levels:
Risk Level | Description | Escalation Pathway | Escalation Action |
---|---|---|---|
Critical Risk | Risk with high likelihood and high impact (rating ≥ 9). Immediate threat to project or organizational objectives. | Escalate to Program Manager/Executive Team/Steering Committee. | Immediate action; prioritization of resources for resolution. |
Medium Risk | Risk with medium likelihood and medium/high impact (rating 6–8). Could affect key outcomes but manageable. | Escalate to Department Head/Project Manager for increased oversight. | Monitor closely and implement mitigation plans. |
Low Risk | Risk with low likelihood and low impact (rating < 6). Manageable, but should be monitored. | Monitor at the team level, inform Department Head if escalated. | Monitor, record, and adjust mitigation as necessary. |
3. Escalation Form Section
Risk ID | Escalation Date | Escalated By | Escalation Level | Escalation Recipient | Escalation Action Required | Deadline for Action | Status Update | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R001 | [Date] | [Name] | Critical | [Program Manager] | Immediate recruitment of additional staff | [Date] | [Status] | [Comments] |
R002 | [Date] | [Name] | Medium | [Finance Team Lead] | Explore additional funding sources | [Date] | [Status] | [Comments] |
R003 | [Date] | [Name] | Medium | [MEL Team Lead] | Schedule a training session for data collection | [Date] | [Status] | [Comments] |
Escalation Steps:
- Identify Critical or Unresolved Risks: If a risk reaches a high rating or is unresolved for more than a week, it must be escalated to the appropriate manager or team.
- Complete the Escalation Form: Document all details on the escalation form, including actions, recipients, and deadlines.
- Immediate Action: The escalation recipient takes responsibility and ensures immediate action is taken to resolve the issue.
- Follow-up: The original risk owner should follow up regularly and ensure that progress is made to address the risk.
4. Risk Closure
Once a risk has been mitigated or resolved, it is marked as “Closed” in the risk register. Ensure all relevant stakeholders are informed, and a Post-Escalation Review (if applicable) is conducted to assess the handling and resolution of the risk.
Risk ID | Closure Date | Resolution/Outcome | Responsible Party | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
R001 | [Date] | New staff recruited successfully | HR/Program Management | Closed |
R002 | [Date] | Additional funding sourced from new donor | Finance Team | Closed |
R003 | [Date] | Staff trained, data collection process improved | MEL Team/Training Team | Closed |
5. Key Takeaways
The SayPro Risk Register and Escalation Form provides a clear, systematic way to track risks, evaluate their severity, and escalate them if necessary. This ensures that risks are mitigated promptly and with the necessary level of attention, minimizing potential project disruptions.
How to Use This Form:
- Regularly Update the Risk Register: Risk management is an ongoing process. Ensure that all identified risks are documented, categorized, and assigned to the correct team.
- Follow the Escalation Process: When a risk becomes critical or requires immediate action, escalate it promptly using the provided escalation form.
- Ensure Follow-Up: After escalation, ensure follow-up to ensure that the actions taken are appropriate, and the risk is resolved.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.