*Can an employee request a different person to review the appeal?

at SayPro, an employee can request a different person to review their appeal under certain circumstances. The process is designed to ensure fairness, transparency, and impartiality in the review of disciplinary decisions. If an employee feels that the original reviewer or panel may have a conflict of interest or is not impartial, they can request a different individual or panel to handle the appeal. Below is a detailed explanation of how this request is handled:

---

1. Requesting an Alternative Reviewer

An employee may request that a different person or panel reviews their appeal for several reasons, such as concerns about bias or conflict of interest. Such a request should be made in writing and should clearly outline the reasons for the employee’s dissatisfaction with the current review panel or individual handling the appeal. These reasons might include:

• Conflict of Interest: If the employee believes that the current reviewer has a personal or professional relationship with the individuals involved in the original disciplinary decision, they may request an alternative reviewer to ensure impartiality.
• Bias or Prejudice: If the employee feels that the reviewer has demonstrated bias or prejudice in their decision-making process, they may request that someone else handles the appeal to ensure a fair and unbiased review.
• Perceived Incompetence or Unfairness: If the employee perceives that the original reviewer lacks the necessary expertise, knowledge, or fairness to handle the appeal, they may request a different person or panel.

---

2. How to Make the Request

To formally request a different reviewer, the employee should submit the request in writing to HR or the relevant appeal department. The written request should include:

• The Reason for the Request: The employee should clearly articulate why they believe a different person or panel should review their appeal. This could include concerns about impartiality, bias, or a conflict of interest.
• Specific Concerns: The employee should outline any specific concerns they have about the current reviewer or panel, providing relevant details to support their request.
• Suggested Alternative (if applicable): In some cases, the employee may suggest an alternative individual or panel to handle the appeal. However, it is at the discretion of the company to approve or reject this suggestion based on the availability of personnel and the appropriateness of the individual or panel.

---

3. HR Review of the Request

Once the request is submitted, HR or the relevant department will review the employee’s concerns to determine whether the request for a different reviewer is warranted. The company will assess the situation based on the following:

• Assessment of Bias or Conflict: HR will evaluate whether there is any valid reason to believe that the current reviewer or panel could be biased or have a conflict of interest that would affect their ability to make an impartial decision.
• Employee Concerns: HR will consider the employee’s concerns and evaluate whether they are reasonable based on the facts and the context of the case. This may involve reviewing the disciplinary process, the identities of the individuals involved, and the potential for perceived bias.
• Company Policy and Precedents: HR will also consider whether the request aligns with company policies and precedents. SayPro aims to ensure consistency and fairness in all disciplinary processes, and requests for alternate reviewers will be handled in accordance with the company’s established procedures.

---

4. Outcome of the Request

After reviewing the request, HR will communicate their decision to the employee. The possible outcomes include:

• Approval of the Request: If HR determines that there is a valid reason to assign a different person or panel to the appeal, they will approve the request and arrange for a new reviewer. This may involve selecting a different individual from HR or another senior manager who was not involved in the original decision.
• Denial of the Request: If HR determines that the concerns raised by the employee are not substantial or do not meet the criteria for reassignment, the request may be denied. In this case, the original reviewer or panel will continue to handle the appeal process.

---

5. Ensuring Fairness and Impartiality

Regardless of whether a new reviewer is assigned, SayPro takes steps to ensure that the appeal process is fair and impartial. This includes:

• Transparency in Decision-Making: The employee will be kept informed of the reasons for any decisions made, including the reasoning behind the selection of the appeal panel or the reviewer.
• Documentation of the Process: All steps in the appeal process, including any requests for a different reviewer, will be documented thoroughly to ensure transparency and accountability.
• Impartiality in Review: If a different person or panel is assigned to the appeal, they will be briefed on the case in an impartial manner, ensuring that they can make an informed and unbiased decision.

---

6. Legal Considerations

In cases where an employee feels that the request for a different reviewer stems from a more serious concern, such as potential discrimination or harassment, they may be advised to seek legal counsel. Legal advisors can help the employee understand their rights and the options available to them, including seeking external mediation or filing a complaint with an employment tribunal.

---

7. Conclusion

At SayPro, employees have the right to request a different person to review their appeal if they believe that the original reviewer or panel may be biased, have a conflict of interest, or be otherwise unsuitable to handle the case. The request must be made in writing, and HR will review the request based on the concerns raised by the employee. If the request is approved, a different individual or panel will handle the appeal to ensure fairness and impartiality. SayPro is committed to maintaining a transparent and fair process in all disciplinary matters, ensuring that all employees have an opportunity to contest disciplinary actions in a just manner.