SayPro Compliance Checklist: A checklist to ensure all QCTO standards are met before course submission.

Written by

SayPro Table of Contents

Course Title:
Course Code:
Instructor:
Submission Date:

Course Overview: Is there a clear course description that outlines the focus, goals, and scope of the course?
Learning Outcomes: Are the learning outcomes aligned with QCTO standards and clearly articulated?
Course Content: Does the course content comprehensively cover the key topics required for the subject area?
Course Duration: Is the course duration in line with QCTO regulations (e.g., minimum number of hours)?
Instructional Strategies: Are the instructional methods (e.g., lectures, discussions, case studies, practical sessions) suitable for the course content and designed to meet student needs?

Assessment Methods: Are diverse and valid assessment methods (e.g., exams, research papers, practical projects) used to evaluate learning outcomes?
Assessment Criteria: Are the assessment criteria clear, aligned with the learning outcomes, and compliant with QCTO requirements?
Assessment Weightings: Are the assessment weightings reasonable and balanced, in accordance with QCTO guidelines?
Feedback Mechanisms: Does the course include clear timelines for providing feedback to students on assessments?

Qualification Framework: Does the course align with the QCTO Qualification Framework for the specific qualification or field of study?
Unit Standards: Are relevant unit standards identified and included where applicable?
Exit Level Outcomes (ELOs): Are the course’s exit-level outcomes (ELOs) aligned with QCTO guidelines?
Moderation: Is a clear plan for moderation outlined to ensure assessment validity and fairness?

Required Materials: Are all required resources, such as textbooks, software, and supplementary readings, specified in the course outline?
Learning Materials: Are the learning materials (e.g., lecture notes, online content) up to date and relevant to the course objectives?
Fieldwork/Practical Sessions: If applicable, is there a plan for any fieldwork or practical training that meets QCTO standards?

Course Schedule: Does the course include a detailed schedule of topics, activities, and deadlines?
Instructor Details: Is the instructor’s qualification and experience documented to meet QCTO standards?
Assessment Submission Dates: Are deadlines for assessments clearly stated, and do they allow sufficient time for students to complete their work?

Accreditation Status: Is the course accredited by the relevant accrediting body (e.g., QCTO, CHE)?
Moderation Plan: Is there a documented plan for internal and external moderation of assessments?
Continuous Improvement: Does the course include mechanisms for continuous improvement, such as student feedback, periodic reviews, or audits?

Academic Integrity: Are policies on plagiarism, cheating, and academic integrity in place and clearly communicated to students?
Disability Access: Are accommodations provided for students with disabilities, as per QCTO regulations and institutional guidelines?
Health and Safety: If fieldwork or practical sessions are included, are health and safety standards clearly outlined?

Course Submission Form: Is the course submission form completed and signed by the course instructor and relevant department heads?
Feedback Incorporation: Have all necessary revisions based on internal reviews or feedback been incorporated into the course materials?
Documentation: Are all required documents, such as course outlines, syllabi, and assessment rubrics, attached and properly formatted?

I confirm that all aspects of the Introduction to Environmental Science (ENV 101) course meet the QCTO standards and requirements.

Instructor Name:
Date:
Signature:

Comments