SayPro Feedback Form Template

SayPro Monthly January SCRR-15

SayPro Monthly Research: Provide Recommendations

Legislative Impact Assessments Research Office

SayPro Research Royalty from Feedback Form Template

---

Template Title: Legislative Impact Assessment Feedback Form

Form Section: Evaluation of Legislative Measures’ Effectiveness

---

Survey Question:
“On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you think the current [legislative measure] will be in achieving its intended goals? Please explain your rating.”

Purpose of the Question:

This question aims to gather insights and opinions from participants regarding the effectiveness of a specific legislative measure. The goal is to assess whether stakeholders, whether they are policymakers, professionals in the field, or the general public, believe the measure will meet its goals as outlined by the legislative body. The provided rating scale (1 to 5) serves to gauge the strength of the belief in the measure’s potential success or failure. The follow-up explanation allows respondents to articulate the reasons behind their rating, providing qualitative data for analysis.

Scale Description:

1. Rating 1 – Highly Ineffective:
   A rating of 1 suggests that the respondent believes the legislative measure is unlikely to achieve its intended goals at all. This could be due to perceived flaws in the measure’s design, poor alignment with the needs of the population it serves, or inherent practical issues. The respondent may feel that the goals of the measure are unrealistic or overly ambitious, or that the resources allocated are insufficient.
2. Rating 2 – Ineffective:
   A rating of 2 reflects a belief that the legislative measure is unlikely to achieve its intended goals, though there may be some aspects that could work with significant improvements or changes. The respondent may identify issues with certain components of the measure but feel that with modification, it might have the potential to succeed.
3. Rating 3 – Neutral/Undecided:
   A rating of 3 signifies that the respondent is unsure or believes that the legislative measure may or may not achieve its intended goals. This rating might reflect a balance of both positive and negative aspects of the measure. Respondents may express uncertainty due to a lack of information, mixed evidence, or a belief that it is too early to judge the measure’s effectiveness.
4. Rating 4 – Effective:
   A rating of 4 indicates that the respondent believes the legislative measure will likely achieve its intended goals, though with some room for improvement. Respondents may feel that the measure has strong potential but acknowledge that challenges exist in its implementation or that certain adjustments could enhance its effectiveness.
5. Rating 5 – Highly Effective:
   A rating of 5 indicates that the respondent believes the legislative measure will almost certainly achieve its intended goals. Respondents giving this rating are likely confident in the design and structure of the measure, its alignment with needs, its resource allocation, and its potential impact.

---

Suggested Recommendations Based on Feedback:

Following the collection of data from the feedback form, the SayPro Legislative Impact Assessments Research Office will compile and analyze the ratings and explanations provided by respondents. Based on this analysis, the following recommendations can be derived:

1. Refinement of Legislative Measures:
   If the majority of feedback leans toward lower ratings (1–2), it will be important to revisit the design of the legislative measure. This might involve re-evaluating the measure’s objectives, aligning them more closely with stakeholders’ needs, ensuring that sufficient resources are allocated, and considering alternative strategies or reforms.
2. Strengthening Support and Communication:
   If the feedback is neutral (rating 3), this may indicate a lack of clarity or awareness regarding the measure’s purpose or expected outcomes. Recommendations may include strengthening communication about the goals, expected benefits, and implementation details, as well as enhancing stakeholder engagement to build consensus and trust.
3. Capitalizing on Positive Feedback:
   If a significant portion of the feedback is positive (ratings 4–5), recommendations might focus on ensuring that the measure continues on its current course with minor adjustments, providing additional resources for its successful implementation, or considering expanding its scope. Positive feedback can also be used as a foundation for promoting the measure to other stakeholders and ensuring that the momentum is maintained.
4. Monitoring and Evaluation:
   Regardless of the feedback received, it will be important to recommend continuous monitoring and evaluation of the legislative measure’s progress. This would involve regularly reviewing outcomes, measuring success against the intended goals, and gathering additional feedback to make necessary adjustments and improvements. A feedback loop ensures that the measure evolves in response to real-world challenges and changing conditions.

---

Template Utilization:

This feedback form template will be distributed to relevant stakeholders, such as industry professionals, policymakers, and advocacy groups, depending on the nature of the legislative measure. The insights gathered will contribute significantly to the ongoing legislative review process and help inform the development of future measures, adjustments to existing policies, and the creation of best practices.

---

This detailed feedback form, along with the subsequent analysis, will provide actionable insights to enhance the effectiveness of legislative efforts, ensuring they are better aligned with public needs and expectations.