SayPro Templates to Use:

SayPro Data Visualization Template: Pre-designed charts, graphs, and tables that can be easily adapted for different types of data.

SayPro Data Visualization Template

Visualizing Curriculum Evaluation Data

---

1. SayPro Curriculum Evaluation Summary

Chart 1: Overall Course Rating

• Type: Bar Chart
• Description: Display an average rating for various course evaluation criteria (e.g., relevance, clarity, engagement).
• X-axis: Evaluation Criteria (e.g., Relevance, Clarity, Engagement, etc.)
• Y-axis: Rating (1-5 scale)
• Data Example:
  • Relevance: 4.2
  • Clarity: 3.8
  • Engagement: 4.5
  • Instructional Materials: 4.0
  • Pedagogical Approach: 3.9

---

Chart 2: Learning Outcomes Achievement

• Type: Pie Chart
• Description: Show the percentage of students achieving different levels of course outcomes.
• Categories:
  • Fully Achieved
  • Partially Achieved
  • Not Achieved
• Data Example:
  • Fully Achieved: 60%
  • Partially Achieved: 30%
  • Not Achieved: 10%

---

2.SayPro Assessment Breakdown

Chart 3: Assessment Method Distribution

• Type: Stacked Bar Chart
• Description: Illustrate the proportion of different types of assessments used in the course (e.g., exams, assignments, projects, etc.).
• X-axis: Assessment Types
• Y-axis: Percentage of Total Assessments
• Data Example:
  • Exams: 40%
  • Assignments: 30%
  • Projects: 20%
  • Quizzes: 10%

---

Chart 4: Assessment Scores Distribution

• Type: Histogram
• Description: Show the distribution of scores across students.
• X-axis: Score Ranges (e.g., 0-20, 21-40, etc.)
• Y-axis: Number of Students
• Data Example:
  • 0-20: 5 students
  • 21-40: 10 students
  • 41-60: 15 students
  • 61-80: 8 students
  • 81-100: 3 students

---

3.SayPro Stakeholder Feedback

Chart 5: Instructor Feedback

• Type: Radar Chart
• Description: Compare instructor feedback across multiple dimensions (e.g., teaching effectiveness, content clarity, engagement).
• Axes:
  • Teaching Effectiveness
  • Content Clarity
  • Engagement
  • Feedback Timeliness
  • Student Interaction
• Data Example:
  • Teaching Effectiveness: 4.5
  • Content Clarity: 4.0
  • Engagement: 3.8
  • Feedback Timeliness: 4.2
  • Student Interaction: 4.3

---

Chart 6: Student Satisfaction Rating

• Type: Likert Scale Table
• Description: Display student satisfaction data with Likert scale responses.
• Table Columns:
  • Statement
  • Strongly Agree
  • Agree
  • Neutral
  • Disagree
  • Strongly Disagree
• Table Rows (Sample Statements):
  • “The course content was relevant.”
  • “The assessments were fair and aligned with learning outcomes.”
  • “The course materials were helpful.”

Statement	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
The course content was relevant.	30%	50%	15%	5%	0%
The assessments were fair and aligned with learning outcomes.	40%	45%	10%	5%	0%
The course materials were helpful.	35%	55%	5%	5%	0%

---

4. SayPro Course Improvements and Recommendations

Chart 7: Suggested Curriculum Changes

• Type: Word Cloud
• Description: Display a word cloud of the most common suggestions for course improvement based on feedback.
• Data Example:
  • Keywords: “More examples,” “Interactive activities,” “Updated resources,” “More group work”

---

Chart 8: Frequency of Suggested Changes

• Type: Column Chart
• Description: Show the frequency of different types of suggested improvements (e.g., better assessment methods, more interaction, better resources).
• X-axis: Suggested Improvement Types
• Y-axis: Frequency (Number of mentions)
• Data Example:
  • More interaction: 20 mentions
  • Updated resources: 15 mentions
  • Better assessments: 10 mentions
  • More group work: 5 mentions

---

5. SayPro Overall Course Performance

Chart 9: Average Student Performance by Assessment

• Type: Line Graph
• Description: Track student performance over time across various assessments.
• X-axis: Time (e.g., Week 1, Week 2, Midterm, Final)
• Y-axis: Average Score (%)
• Data Example:
  • Week 1: 65%
  • Week 2: 72%
  • Midterm: 78%
  • Final: 85%

---

6. SayPro Summary Table: Course Evaluation Results

Evaluation Criteria	Rating (1-5)	Comments/Feedback
Course Relevance	4.2	Highly relevant content
Clarity of Course Objectives	3.8	Somewhat vague in parts
Student Engagement	4.5	Engaging discussions
Quality of Assessments	4.0	Good variety of methods
Instructor’s Effectiveness	4.5	Very clear and organized
Student Learning Outcomes	4.1	Good, but could improve